The Cora-Zone

Calvin and Hobbes: The Nature Strips

2010-11-22T11:10:00.019-05:00

Calvin and Hobbes: The Nature Strips

Calvin and Hobbes is a syndicated comic strip that ran in newspapers from 1985 to 1995. The strip shows the imaginative fun and mischief of a six year old boy named Calvin and his anthropomorphic tiger Hobbes (to Calvin, he is a live talking and walking tiger while to others he is a stuffed tiger). Despite the trouble and chaos they ensue on their house, neighbors, and classmates (Hobbes has eaten a bully or too), the two engage in philosophical conversations with each other (they are named after philosophers John Calvin and Thomas Hobbes) about life and the nature of people. A common theme within the strip is environmentalism and the conservation of the wilderness around them. During their time outside, be it during summer vacation or a cold winter day, Calvin and Hobbes truly lose themselves in the vastness of nature, engaging in activities like racing down a dangerous hill on a wagon or sled only to fly off a cliff or into a lake, getting into a snowball fight with the neighbor girl, Susie Derkins, or just taking a relaxing walk through the woods. Even though Calvin’s father tends to drag him on an unbearable family vacation to an island that only he, Calvin’s dad, enjoys, Calvin and Hobbes love nature.

The writings of Henry David Thoreau quickly come to mind when thinking of these two and their adventures in nature. At times, Bill Watterson takes a pastoral look at nature, much as Thoreau’s writing depicts, and shows Calvin, Hobbes, and in some cases Calvin’s dad, getting out into nature. Nature becomes a sanctuary, giving Calvin and Hobbes a chance to think about the world in a larger scope than when they are in the house. It is no wonder that many of their philosophical conversations take place in nature.

In this post, I will be discussing the many conversations, interactions, and revelations about or happening within nature that Calvin and Hobbes encounter and discuss. There will be times where Calvin enjoys being out in the elements, soaking up the air and the feeling of being alive, while other times he’ll be put in a foul mood be it by man’s carelessness of how they treat the world around them, his father constantly dragging his family to a remote region for family bonding, or just an all-around “summer is over and school is starting up again” blues. So without further ado, these are the strips of the adventures and epiphanies of nature staring Calvin and Hobbes.

Dad’s Vacations

Calvin’s father, a slave to a desk job in the city, is constantly getting himself and the family back into nature every summer, much to the displeasure of Calvin and Mom. It is a tale that is told frequently throughout Watterson’s many collections of Calvin and Hobbes, and it would seem that every time he does it, the response is always the same: Dad enjoys himself, Mom questions why she marries him, and Calvin bluntly vocalizes how much he hates being away from the TV.

It is very clear that Calvin’s dad is a firm believer in getting back into nature by camping. Unfortunately for him, he’s the only one. Getting up at the crack of dawn to go swimming, boating, and fishing seems to be the best thing he wants to do to escape the endless hustle and bustle of working in an office in the big city. However, Calvin and his mom represent the exact opposite. Instead of wanting the fresh catch that Dad has proudly caught, gutted, and prepared for them as a good nutritious breakfast, Mom made it very clear that the last thing she wants to eat is something from nature at such an early hour. Calvin, in true six year old fashion, would rather be watching TV at home than be in a cabin in the middle of nature.

Calvin and Hobbes make an attempt to enjoy their stay by taking a canoe expedition in the lake near the cabin. The overactive imagination that Calvin possesses attempts to get him interested in nature by running wild. Unfortunately, Hobbes being the voice of reality, succeeds at thwarting these attempts of seeing a whale, eel, and (of all things to find in a lake) a “mast of an old Spanish galleon, sunk hundreds of years ago.” Hopes all foiled, Calvin to continues his rants on camping with his family in the wood with no TV.

Another moment in Calvin’s trip into the wilderness. Calvin’s six-year old desires crave the mind depleting entertainment that a television provides. Unfortunately, he must find other endeavors to keep himself amused. As majestic as a sunset is as it falls behind the trees, shining orange light upon the water, Calvin is anything but moved by this display.

In yet another camping excursion with Dad, Calvin finds himself on a canoe. While Calvin’s dad is soaking in every moment of it, Calvin plans to make a “daring overboard escape.” It’s safe to say that when it comes to being in nature, the last thing Calvin ever wants to do is camp in it.

The Coldest Winter

Wintertime in Calvin’s neighborhood brings out a “getting out into nature” attitude that everyone (except for Mom) adapts. From sledding down dangerous tree and rock filled hills, snowball fights with enough ice, rocks, and twigs in them to draw blood, even the joy of creating a snowman gives Calvin the excuse to put on a coat and hat and run outside. As long as his homework is done, because school does not close for an inch of snow.

There are times when Calvin does decide to become one with nature. It has become very clear that Calvin’s favorite season is winter, when everything is covered with snow, and (if it snows enough) there is no going to school. On this certain occasion, Calvin and Hobbes go to the near his house for a day of tobogganing. However, this time he does not wish to toboggan but to show his best friend one of his favorite past times on a cloudy winter day. As Hobbes lies relaxed on the toboggan, Calvin explains that on days like these, he tends to reflect on the silence, stillness, and peacefulness associated with winter, as if it was a moment of meditation from the noise of the other seasons and civilization. Poor Hobbes never saw that this was an elaborate trap set up by Calvin to bring chaos to the quiet winter day.

Here we find Dad back outside in the elements, but this time during the winter months. The first two panels explain it all how Dad feels about the blustery weather. As he walks in from the cold, he reflects on how good it feels to be outside in the snow, encouraging the rest of his family to join him in the fun of it. Unfortunately, as seen in the camping section, Mom and Calvin are not having any parts of it and quickly chastise Dad for babbling about the cold they want to stay out of and, on top of that, leaving the door so that the said cold can come in.

Calvin’s Backyard Nature Revelations

Despite what he thinks about camping with his family, there are instances where Calvin has a soft spot of nature. In these instances, he acknowledges that humans are not the only ones that inhabit this earth and that the balance between man and nature should be respected at all times. So when man oversteps their boundaries into nature, Calvin will express his usual angry and blunt disapproval. It all starts when he takes a trip through the woods in his backyard.

In a three strip series, Calvin and Hobbes discover that a clearly had been made in the woods. To his disdain, he discovers the culprit is man, specifically the people at Shady Acres Condominiums. A deeply enraged Calvin goes off on a ranting tirade about how animals have no use for condos and more use of the trees that use to inhabit the area. He then puts the wild idea in the air that humans would not like it if animals suddenly bulldozed a suburb and put in new trees, an idea that Hobbes intended to pursue. Had it not been for the construction workers taking their keys before leaving for the day, a suburb would have been leveled in revenge of the animals that had lost their homes. In the final strip, Calvin, defeated by the fact that he could not reverse what had happened laments on the loss of the woods. His train of thought adds that once they build the new houses, “they have to widen the roads and put up gas stations, and pretty soon [the] whole area will be just be a big strip.” Still refusing to accept the reality, he asks the question if he could “refuse to inherit the world.” Hobbes, being the realist that he is, crushes his hopes by saying that it would be too late to refuse it when you are born. This series illustrates the worst case scenario given if people continue to expand civilization and deplete the wilderness.

Calvin and Hobbes are on another one of their many excursions out into the wilderness and Calvin brings up that the world is full of sounds from people, radios, and engines (I’ll assume vehicles like cars, planes, etc.). As soon as they get into the wilderness, he brings up how “startling” it is to be in the stillness of nature versus the hustle and bustle of everyday life. To Hobbes, it’s relaxing and very therapeutic, similar to the snowy hill and the toboggan; to Calvin, it’s nerve wrecking.

After discovering several cans strewn in various parts of the forest, a livid Calvin makes an angry declaration that the people on the planet don’t care about the world they live in. This shows that Calvin, even though he is back and forth about it, cares about nature and that it is important for the humans in it to conserve it and not trash it. Hobbes being the animal that he is, states he takes pride in not being human, not worrying about leaving non-biodegradable waste in the woods. Calvin, feeling that his race is not going to change, strips and follows suit. This speaks volumes about how the two see humanity in relation to nature: Calvin, being a human, understands that there are certain balances that humans must not interfere with, but cannot change the fact that there are humans out there who do indeed mess up the world for every person and animal in it; Hobbes also knows that there is a balance between humans and nature, but he considers himself lucky that he is not a part of the problem, even though if he was, either way he could do nothing to become the solution.

Here we have another Sunday strip of Calvin and Hobbes and the trash in the woods. An angered Calvin once again questions the mental capacity and the consideration of humans towards nature. I must say Hobbes’ strange sense of optimism is somewhat baffling. In the previous strips, he is pretty dismissive of all humans changing their ways to better the woods. In this strip however, he seems to think that a change in smarter thinking (more than cleaner actions) is a possibility. Whether or not it was a sarcastic quip (as seen in the last panel) cannot be determined, but as Hobbes is more for animals than humans, it cannot be ruled out.

Well this is certainly an eye-opener. A simple yet grim fact about the deforestation of America has sparked an epiphany of the life happening in outer space. A quote like this makes one wonder if it is true. Is there an intelligent species on the outer banks of our universe and is the only thing that is keeping them from contacting us is the fact that we destroy our planet’s flora and fauna by chopping down trees in the woods? Since there have been no real evidence of an extraterrestrial, it would seem that this would be a truthful statement.

During a summer wagon run, Calvin gets an epiphany: The world should have had fewer inhabitants. His reasoning behind this is the way resources would be distributed would not have any of the complications as it does now. Although this seems to be a brilliant idea to Calvin, Hobbes dismisses it as preaching to the choir.

This just screams Thoreau, with just a dash of Darwin. Calvin ponders about the modern world and its consumption of electricity and resources. Determined to find an answer to most important question in the world, Calvin asks Hobbes “What’s our purpose in life?” Calvin sets himself up for this fall, as asking a tiger whose animal instincts seem to be on high gear for the majority of the time, spawns that answer of sheer and utter cannibalism.

Global warming. Whether or not one believes it is always up for debate, but it cannot be argued that the cause of it is quite real. Calvin for one is not happy with it. Going back to Calvin understanding that being a human makes him the one to inherit the world, he decides to go to the one person he can blame this on: his mom.

The theories of price and value are put up to discussion when Calvin tells Hobbes about their being talk of opening wilderness for development, or clearing out woods to obtain needs (oil, timber, minerals, and housing). This talk of opening wilderness is only to be at the price of destroying nature. What I find particularly interesting is Calvin’s uses of nature (unspoiled beauty, wildlife, solitude, and spiritual renewal). With that said, Hobbes’s dialogue brought everything together: “We need to start putting prices on the priceless.”

If there is one part of nature that brings Calvin down is autumn Sundays. They are just another reminder that summer is gone and that school is right around the corner for another week of boredom in class. Hobbes, on the other hand, loves autumn. Unable to understand Calvin’s plight of going back to school, Hobbes instead looks at autumn through aesthetic eyes, comparing the changing of the leaves to a “fireworks display” (KAPOW! FWOOSH! ZINGG!). Angered and jealous of Hobbes’ freedom and how he rubs it in, Calvin plots a painful rebuttal by picking up apples and preparing to let them fly.

Summertime

When school lets out for the summer, Calvin takes full advantage of being able to go out into the wildness of his backyard and either play or do nothing. This is the period where Calvin is the most in love with his natural surroundings, applying a full Thoreau mindset as he explores the woods, looking for a new adventure to get into or looking for another quiet spot to curl up to next Hobbes and goof off.

Here we find Calvin and Hobbes enjoying their favorite summer pastime: absolutely nothing. How they choose to accomplish this is by finding a shady, peaceful spot near the river and relax. Granted they could have stayed inside, watched TV, or read comic books, but instead they decided to make a journey outside and crash, soaking up the summer air for as long as they can. In other strips, Calvin complains that the summer season isn’t long enough—

—such as this strip, for example. Calvin is deeply distressed that the summer days are “slipping through.” It is clear that Calvin loses track of time when he spends the majority of his summer doing nothing. However, in this next strip—

Calvin takes time to make an actual itinerary of a summer day. Everything from digging in the back yard, hitting Susie with a water gun, to running from a snake that they think is poisonous. Their plans are very much foiled at the end of the day when Calvin’s mom scoops them both up. This proves that summer days are a double-edged sword; whether or not Calvin and Hobbes are doing something, there aren’t enough hours in the day nor are there enough days in the break to begin with.

In conclusion, nature was a common theme for Calvin and Hobbes. Camping and autumn Sundays excluded, the two are very much in love with their nature surroundings and also realize that their world is vaster than just their backyard. Understanding that is important. It’s important because we must know where the resources are and how to use them efficiently rather than just effectively. For if we do not, we may not have a world left. Then it will be as Hobbes said: we’ll be here to “devour each other.”

Final Blog Post: Reflection

2010-11-15T19:26:00.000-05:00

Before I start this final reflection blog, I am going to be completely honest. After I had hurt my arm, I was slacking in the blog posts. According to my blog I have about four posts, besides the post that introduced me to everyone in the class. Hopefully this reflection will sum up just how much I have learned in this class about the environment, sustainability, the food industry, and all of the writings that describe these topics. I loved everything we have discussed and I feel that is has made me knowledgeable of my surroundings and has turned me into a better consumer of all of the products that I eat and use.

Cronen vs. Thoreau

When I first read Thoreau’s section in American Earth, I was very much turned off until the end. It is not because it was boring, but it felt a little over the top for me. Granted I was just getting my feet wet into the material of the class, but when started getting into the Bible and comparing and contrasting nature and civilization, that is where I got lost. Fortunately for me, Cronen felt the exact same way. Cronen counters that for Thoreau to make nature it’s on religion is just flawed all the way around, especially Thoreau’s statement “reclaiming the garden.” I’m just going to assume that he is talking about the Garden of Eden, the place where man was banished from. As much as I believe that God smiles upon us for being good to nature, it is impossible for me to believe that He is going to let us reclaim the Garden of Eden. Furthermore, it is impossible to even consider ANY form of nature now is comparable to the Garden of Eden in the first place.

Eric Schlosser Lecture

I admit, I should have stayed longer at the lecture. I now regret leaving. Unbeknownst to him, Schlosser had drastically changed my life style. Ever since that day, if I could help it, I never ate at McDonald’s again. After hearing what he told me up until the time I had left, reading about the fast food industry in The Omnivore’s Dilemma and watching Food, Inc. (which I’ll be discussing later), I just could not believe that the food that I had been eating as a kid was made in such a horrible and dishonest fashion. Don’t get me wrong, I knew McDonald’s was unhealthy for me, but I never imagined that it would be more hurtful than I originally thought. Even more so, the unfair business practice was horrifying to take in as well. It takes some kind of monster to buy a partnership with an already successful business, only to move right across the street and then completely screw over the people he partnered with to get there. But back to the food, I knew that frying the stuff was bad because of all the fat and cholesterol. Imagine my surprise when I found out that the meat is never cleaned properly. The animals had to stand in their own waste as well as waste of other animals, waiting to get slaughtered. Also, the meat is injected with hormones to speed up the growth of animals. That is horrifying. I’ve been told all my life that steroids do some pretty heinous things to the human body. So why would I want that in my food? At the end of the day, despite what I put in my post, I am ashamed that I left (even though the reason why I left still resonates with me), but thankfully, there was more discussion in class to further cement my boycott of McDonald’s.

Michael Clayton

It just goes to show you that big business has no place in the wilderness. If Erin Brockovich wasn’t enough proof of this, then Michael Clayton certainly picks up the slack. The theme of the movie is toxic discourse, or the events that happen when something endangers the environment and the people responsible (normally big business owners) try to cover it up as best as they can. What I learned is that the business owners do not give a damn about the little man if the little man is not paying them. A simple water contamination turned into a girl getting very sick, a scientist who, along with Clayton, uncovered this conspiracy getting murdered inside his own home, and a lawyer trying to make sure that they do not get away with it. It was very entertaining to watch, but the message was clear. What is sad about this is that is not a new practice, as the next section will explain.

Cesar Chavez

Continuing on with the talk of toxic discourse comes Cesar Chavez and his war with the grape farmers against the California government and the use of pesticides. A boycott was called on all grapes from California in protest to the unfair working conditions and wages, as well as the problems brought about from the deadly pesticides. I honestly thought that McDonalds was bad, but compared to the stuff that makes the pesticides, a Big Mac is not all that bad. When you have agents that cause cancer and ingredients that are similar to nerve and mustard gas, why would anyone want to eat it? What I admire most about this piece is how Cesar spoke of victims of the pesticides as a way to show the world what the California grape manufacturers and the government wanted to hide. By doing this, it would seem the powers have no choice but to make changes, knowing that the secret they tried to keep was revealed to everyone watching.

Food, Inc.

Although I never blogged about this, I feel it just needed to be talked about. Food, Inc. changed my consciousness as a consumer. I am now more aware of what goes into my food, as well as how my food is manufactured and shipped to my store for my consumption. It made me realize that the food industry is gruesome, not for the fact that they slaughter meat, but for the fact that it has gone unregulated for all this time and they continue to practice unsafe and unhealthy practices. I applaud Salatin for sticking to his guns and not turning over his farm to the big food industry and instead choosing to function as a home grown farm. From the inhumane way they treat chickens and cows, I would have done the same thing. What’s shocking is that money is not even the issue for Salatin, as he is very successful with his farming. What I admire most about him is how he stays with his values and that’s all that really matter to him.

Conclusion

This class has been a great experience for me. I’ve taken a lot out of it and I expert to share this knowledge with my loved ones. I also plan to make better choices in life as well in regards to the environment and with my health. Who knows? Maybe my actions will affect someone else to do the same.

Grape Drink of Death/Chavez speech

2010-10-10T19:41:00.003-04:00

Cesar Chavez speech on pesticides in grapes very much illustrates toxic discourse. Chavez spoke on the toxic effects that pesticides such as DDT, DDE, and Dieldrinas on the environment, and the workers and consumers of the deadly chemicals. Environmentally, the pesticides affect the soils, air, and even the water. The effect it has on humans can lead to illness, disability, and ultimately death.

When Chavez broke down the ingredients for these pestcides, it should have been a no-brainer to not put this stuff in the environment. You have stuff equal to nerve gas, mustard gas, carcinogens (no seriously, cancer causing agents), and tons of other poisons in this stuff. What is even more disturbing is the fact that these chemicals were BANNED in 1975. Chavez made this speech in 1986. 11 years later, these chemicals were still being used.

The steps taken to keep the public from knowing these chemicals are being used: falsifying test results for chemical testings, governor coverups, etc. If this isn't the 2nd topoi of toxic discourse I don't know what is. So in order to fix and to stop this issue, a boycott of grapes had to be the only solution. By stopping the farming and purchasing of grapes, a downward spike in profits would occur, leaving the Californian government and grape manufacturers no choice but to give in.